Ross Clennett Article
How to Avoid Declined Offers and
Resumes:
Fact or Fiction?
by Ross
Clennett
This article originally appeared in my eNewsletter
InSight
(Issue 21, 27 February 2008)
Subscription is free.
Click here to to subscribe
and receive a free copy of my eBook
Succeed Quickly or Fail Slowly: A High
Performance Framework for Recruiters
The Sunday Age this week
reported that a Federal Government executive was sacked for falsifying his
resume. The resume contained allegedly fake degrees from Internet degree ‘mills'
in the USA where no educational assessment is required (ie you pay the fee - you
have the degree). These weren't just a garden variety BA or BEc. The sacked
worker's resume claimed the following educational ‘qualifications': Ph.D, M.Sc
and an MBA. That in itself
should have been cause for suspicion!
The report went on to
quote a PriceWaterhouseCoopers study from 2003 in which a forensic investigation
of staff at one (unnamed) large financial institution uncovered 40%, yes 40%, of
employees' resumes contained ‘serious mis-statements' (technical accounting term
for lies), including false qualifications.
These stats back up a
report from a US private investigation and security firm,
Kroll who reported that 49% of requested checks on their client's employees
and prospective employees uncovered discrepancies in the resume-stated
employment history compared to what Kroll's background check revealed.
Those employees in
transportation (56.5%) were shown to be the biggest liars and those in
automotive (36.5%) least likely to stretch the truth, Recruiters and HR (51.4%)
ranked as the fourth highest "creative" resume writers out of 16 industry
categories!
These are all scary
statistics for recruiters. Our respective terms of business may have an ‘all
care, no responsibility' clause with respect to the resumes we present, but the
reality is - our clients expect us to have undertaken some basic checks to
substantiate the accuracy and credibility of a candidate's resume.
In this day and age where
the Privacy Act (1988) may not help us easily uncover a candidate's resume
omissions and embellishments, we need to know the legalities of any checks we
may make, or are requested to make by clients.
Try yourself out on the
following quick quiz to see how your information privacy knowledge shapes up.
The answers are at the end of this article.
Are you
required to gain a candidate's explicit permission to undertake ...
(Answer either YES or NO)
-
A check on their
academic transcripts and qualifications?
-
A check on their
employment history with HR?
-
An electoral Role
search?
-
A Birth
Certificate verification?
-
A criminal history
check?
-
A bankruptcy file
search?
-
A driving
history/drivers license search or verification?
-
A Supreme Court
and civil litigation search?
-
A personal
reference check with a previous manager?
-
A check on their
professional affiliations/associations?
-
An ASIC search of
banned or disqualified persons?
-
A check on their
eligibility to work in Australia?
In my experience, every
recruiter asks a candidate to sign a privacy agreement that allows appropriate
work-related background checks to be made. Unfortunately most recruiters do
nothing more than one or two reference checks - and even these are open to
fraud.
My own sobering experience
was when I was recruiting an HR Manager for a client who was very specific about
the type of person he wanted (aren't they all!). After four months, frustrated
by an offer turned down, I finally had a candidate that the client was prepared
to hire. The first reference check, from the job before last, was fine. The
most recent referee was ‘on holiday' and only available on his mobile. I
dutifully took the reference and made a note to check back on the referee's land
line when they were ‘back from holidays'.
As the candidate was going
on their honeymoon and wasn't starting the job for four weeks, it slipped my
mind. When I made the call to the (genuine) referee on the land line, a week
before the candidate was due to start, he said he had never spoken to me before
and told me he had never given a reference on that person. My blood ran cold. It
turned out the candidate had set up her fiancé (now husband) to pose as the
previous boss, and that's who I had taken the ‘reference' from.
Naturally the client, when
informed of this by a very sheepish me, withdrew the offer and had the sympathy
to allow me to continue the assignment until I filled the job. This incident
occurred when I already had ten plus years recruitment experience and I thought
I could ‘pick the liars'!
Don't think it can't
happen to you. Unhappy clients will take action to seek retribution. In 2004 ASX-listed
recruitment company HJB Ltd, and their insurers, made a cash settlement out of
court to a client (ISS Marketing) who was seeking in excess of $1 million
damages after HJB recruited a Financial Controller for them, with an undisclosed
criminal history of fraud, who subsequently defrauded the company of more than
$250,000.
What employment (and
other) checks do you undertake thoroughly every time, on each candidate you represent, to ensure your reputation as a professional recruiter is not
at risk through the actions of a deceptive or fraudulent candidate?
How did you score on the Quiz?
The
answers are:
- A check on their
academic transcripts and qualifications? YES
- A check on their
employment history with HR? YES
- An electoral Role
search? NO
- A Birth
Certificate verification? YES
- A criminal history
check? YES
- A bankruptcy file
search? NO
- A driving
history/drivers license search or verification?
YES
- A Supreme Court
and civil litigation search? NO
- A personal
reference check with a previous manager? YES
- A check on their
professional affiliations/associations? YES
- An ASIC search of
banned or disqualified persons? NO
- A check on their
eligibility to work in Australia? YES
If you scored
poorly on your privacy knowledge, then take action now to rectify your
knowledge before it costs you more than your reputation!
Back to Articles Summary
REPRINT RIGHTS
This article comes
with full reprint rights, which means that you have permission to
re-publish the article on your website, newsletter, eBook or any other
means of reproduction. The only requirement is that you do not make any
editorial changes and that the author’s name is quoted. I would also
appreciate it if you could let me know when and where you publish it.
|