Ross Clennett.com The Recruiter's Recruitment Expert
Services About Ross Membership Events Shop Newsletter Contact Home
Ross Clennett.com

Ross Clennett Article

How to Avoid Declined Offers and

Resumes:  Fact or Fiction?

 

by Ross Clennett

This article originally appeared in my eNewsletter InSight (Issue 21, 27 February 2008)
Subscription is free.  Click here to to subscribe and receive a free copy of my eBook
Succeed Quickly or Fail Slowly: A High Performance Framework for Recruiters
 

The Sunday Age this week reported that a Federal Government executive was sacked for falsifying his resume. The resume contained allegedly fake degrees from Internet degree ‘mills' in the USA where no educational assessment is required (ie you pay the fee - you have the degree). These weren't just a garden variety BA or BEc. The sacked worker's resume claimed the following educational ‘qualifications': Ph.D, M.Sc and an MBA.  That in itself should have been cause for suspicion!

The report went on to quote a PriceWaterhouseCoopers study from 2003 in which a forensic investigation of staff at one (unnamed) large financial institution uncovered 40%, yes 40%, of employees' resumes contained ‘serious mis-statements' (technical accounting term for lies), including false qualifications.

These stats back up a report from a US private investigation and security firm, Kroll who reported that 49% of requested checks on their client's employees and prospective employees uncovered discrepancies in the resume-stated employment history compared to what Kroll's background check revealed.

Those employees in transportation (56.5%) were shown to be the biggest liars and those in automotive (36.5%) least likely to stretch the truth, Recruiters and HR (51.4%) ranked as the fourth highest "creative" resume writers out of 16 industry categories!

These are all scary statistics for recruiters. Our respective terms of business may have an ‘all care, no responsibility' clause with respect to the resumes we present, but the reality is - our clients expect us to have undertaken some basic checks to substantiate the accuracy and credibility of a candidate's resume.

In this day and age where the Privacy Act (1988) may not help us easily uncover a candidate's resume omissions and embellishments, we need to know the legalities of any checks we may make, or are requested to make by clients.

Try yourself out on the following quick quiz to see how your information privacy knowledge shapes up.
The answers are at the end of this article.

Are you required to gain a candidate's explicit permission to undertake ...

(Answer either YES or NO)
  1. A check on their academic transcripts and qualifications?

  2. A check on their employment history with HR?

  3. An electoral Role search?

  4. A Birth Certificate verification?

  5. A criminal history check?

  6. A bankruptcy file search?

  7. A driving history/drivers license search or verification?

  8. A Supreme Court and civil litigation search?

  9. A personal reference check with a previous manager?

  10. A check on their professional affiliations/associations?

  11. An ASIC search of banned or disqualified persons?

  12. A check on their eligibility to work in Australia?

In my experience, every recruiter asks a candidate to sign a privacy agreement that allows appropriate work-related background checks to be made. Unfortunately most recruiters do nothing more than one or two reference checks - and even these are open to fraud.

My own sobering experience was when I was recruiting an HR Manager for a client who was very specific about the type of person he wanted (aren't they all!). After four months, frustrated by an offer turned down, I finally had a candidate that the client was prepared to hire.  The first reference check, from the job before last, was fine. The most recent referee was ‘on holiday' and only available on his mobile. I dutifully took the reference and made a note to check back on the referee's land line when they were ‘back from holidays'.

As the candidate was going on their honeymoon and wasn't starting the job for four weeks, it slipped my mind. When I made the call to the (genuine) referee on the land line, a week before the candidate was due to start, he said he had never spoken to me before and told me he had never given a reference on that person. My blood ran cold. It turned out the candidate had set up her fiancé (now husband) to pose as the previous boss, and that's who I had taken the ‘reference' from.

Naturally the client, when informed of this by a very sheepish me, withdrew the offer and had the sympathy to allow me to continue the assignment until I filled the job. This incident occurred when I already had ten plus years recruitment experience and I thought I could ‘pick the liars'!

Don't think it can't happen to you. Unhappy clients will take action to seek retribution. In 2004 ASX-listed recruitment company HJB Ltd, and their insurers, made a cash settlement out of court to a client (ISS Marketing) who was seeking in excess of $1 million damages after HJB recruited a Financial Controller for them, with an undisclosed criminal history of fraud, who subsequently defrauded the company of more than $250,000.

What employment (and other) checks do you undertake thoroughly every time, on each candidate you represent, to ensure your reputation as a professional recruiter is not at risk through the actions of a deceptive or fraudulent candidate? 

How did you score on the Quiz? 
The answers are:

  1. A check on their academic transcripts and qualifications? YES
  2. A check on their employment history with HR?  YES
  3. An electoral Role search?  NO
  4. A Birth Certificate verification?  YES
  5. A criminal history check?  YES
  6. A bankruptcy file search?  NO
  7. A driving history/drivers license search or verification?  YES
  8. A Supreme Court and civil litigation search?  NO
  9. A personal reference check with a previous manager?  YES
  10. A check on their professional affiliations/associations?  YES
  11. An ASIC search of banned or disqualified persons?  NO
  12. A check on their eligibility to work in Australia?  YES

If you scored poorly on your privacy knowledge, then take action now to rectify your knowledge before it costs you more than your reputation!

Back to Articles Summary

 

REPRINT RIGHTS

 

This article comes with full reprint rights, which means that you have permission to re-publish the article on your website, newsletter, eBook or any other means of reproduction.  The only requirement is that you do not make any editorial changes and that the author’s name is quoted. I would also appreciate it if you could let me know when and where you publish it.

 


Ross Clennett

Home | Privacy Policy | Search this Site

 

Ross Clennett
Footer footer