Continuing my search to understand what underlies the decision making mistakes made by boards of large companies, I turned to the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD), the preeminent educational body for public, private, and not-for-profit company directors in Australia.
I collected a copy of the AICD Professional Development Handbook (July 2014 to June 2015) to see what the program schedule might reveal.
In the handbook’s section for individual professional development as it relates to Board Roles and Responsibilities, Board Operations, Governance, Risk and Strategy, Finance, Management Relations and Board Performance, I counted a total of 52 professional development options covering books, workshops, webinars, and events.
There is a 3.5 hour workshop entitled ‘The Board’s Role in Mergers and Acquisitions’. The content summary included the bullet points ‘Gain insight into the board’s decision-making process for mergers and acquisitions’ and ‘Recognise the questions the board needs to ask advisers/external experts’.
This gave me some optimism that board members are taught the necessary skeptical inquiry skills they need, although I would have preferred content that was a little blunter, such as ’17 out of 20 acquisitions don’t improve shareholder value – why your board should be rejecting almost all acquisition opportunities’ or ‘Why nearly fifty per cent of acquisitions destroy shareholder value – the warning signs to look for’.
When it came to CEO recruitment, unarguably one of the most important jobs of any board, the pickings were much, much slimmer.
There is a 3.5 hour workshop entitled ‘The Board and the CEO’ containing this single bullet point in a total of five bullet points:
‘Improve your knowledge of CEO selection and remuneration’.
Out of 52 workshops totalling approximately two hundred hours of professional development for its members, the AICD sees fit to devote (I’m guessing) one whole hour to CEO recruitment .
I find this neglect of recruitment skills astonishing.
It’s even more astonishing when you consider that Australian boards of publicly-listed companies have a poor, and worsening, track record with respect to CEO tenure.
Last year, a study of Australia’s top 200 companies showed that the average tenure of a local CEO fell from 5.7 years in 2006 to 5 years in 2010 and 4.2 years in 2013, against the historical average of 4.9 years. Globally, the average CEO tenure over the past two years has fallen from 5.4 years to 4.8 years.
The obvious conclusion is that many CEOs are not successful and, in most cases, the original hiring decision was poor.
What should board members be learning with respect to the recruitment of CEOs?
Here’s my proposed curriculum summary:
- Constructing an effective job description and performance profile
- Understanding the core competencies and motivation required to succeed in the job
- How to conduct a behavioural based interview
- How to ask potentially challenging interview questions
- How to probe candidates’ answers to get to the truth
- How to score candidates’ answers and accurately compare candidates
- How to avoid being seduced by a charismatic or high profile candidate
- How to conduct effective reference checks and discover relevant information from reluctant
- How to effectively use a search firm/recruitment agency
- How to negotiate an offer
The reality is that for most board members, especially of publicly-listed companies, it has been many years since they were recruiting executives regularly.
Many of them would have made more internal promotions than external hires. Many of them would be rusty or too reliant on the ‘old boys network’ for referrals to be genuinely effective at assessing
candidates that are largely unknown to them.
Recruitment is a core skill for business leaders, including board members, and especially board members of publicly-listed companies.
I believe the AICD needs to look at the reality of their members’ skills in recruitment and allocate far more time to this business-critical area. As a large country of shareholders (particularly via superannuation funds), every Australian has a vested interest in this occurring sooner rather than later.